Home » Archive by Category

Articles in Attorney Fee Structures

Structuring Attorney Fees & Retirement: Don’t Be Caught by Surprise

March 22, 2013 – 10:12 AM | 40 views

Structuring attorney fees for later cash flow; comparison of after-tax cash flow from structured attorney’s fee vs. income from taxable investment accounts showed higher net income with structured fees.

Structuring Attorney Fees: Language to Use in a Settlement Agreement

May 21, 2012 – 8:44 AM | 87 views

Structuring attorney fees has benefits: better money management of future expenses such as a child’s education or your retirement, possibly lowering your tax bracket, guaranteed payments, and, as with injured-party settlements, receiving more money than if you had taken an initial lump sum payment.

Tax-Deferred Structures in Non-Traditional Cases [The Gavel, Summer 2011]

October 5, 2011 – 9:28 AM | 108 views
Tax-Deferred Structures in Non-Traditional Cases

Attorneys are beginning to look beyond cases typically targeted for structured settlements and recommending the settlement option to clients in a number of non-traditional, non-physical injury recoveries. Almost any type of non-physical settlement can and is being structured.

Sample Structured Settlements Show A Variety of Options

July 1, 2010 – 11:44 AM | 275 views

For some the structured settlement process is best illustrated by sample structures.

Structuring Fees: The Latest Financial Planning Technique?

June 29, 2010 – 11:40 AM | 63 views

Although structured attorney fees do not have all the tax advantages of structured settlements for plaintiffs, there are still elements that make them attractive. Attorneys began using structured payments for legal fees in physical injury or sickness cases after the decision in Childs vs. Commissioner, 103 T.C. 634 (1994), affirmed 898 F3d 856 (1996). The Tax Court held that attorney fees from these types of cases could be received in periodic payments.

Structuring Attorneys Fees – The Fine Print

April 20, 2010 – 11:08 AM | 57 views

Most plaintiff attorneys are aware that their fees can be structured in personal injury cases. Less known is that structured fees, using a life insurance annuity, can also be created in non-injury (non-qualifying) cases.

Do Structured Fees Make Sense for Your Practice?

February 10, 2010 – 12:44 PM | 45 views
Structured Settlements Can Make Long-Term Sense For Your Practice

Structuring attorney fees is increasingly becoming part of a law firm or sole practitioner’s financial planning strategy. Not every fee is eligible and certain initial steps must be taken so the fee qualifies for its preferred tax status. Patrick Farber, a structured settlements broker at Ringler Associates in Southern California, talked with Mark Simurda, a CPA and tax partner with Lesley, Thomas, Schwarz & Postma, Inc., in Newport Beach about structuring settlement fees.

Structured Attorney Fees Can Reap Long-Term Benefits

June 1, 2009 – 10:01 PM | 20 views
Long Term Success with Strucured Settlments

Most attorneys are familiar with creating structured settlements for their fees whenever their personal injury clients agree to their own structured settlement. Many attorneys, however, are unaware that these same fee structures can be arranged on a stand-alone basis–even when the client chooses to accept a lump sum payment or in certain non-injury, contingency fee cases.